| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • Browse and search Google Drive and Gmail attachments (plus Dropbox and Slack files) with a unified tool for working with your cloud files. Try Dokkio (from the makers of PBworks) for free. Now available on the web, Mac, Windows, and as a Chrome extension!

View
 

Cesidian revolution

Page history last edited by Cesidio Tallini 2 weeks, 5 days ago

The Cesidian — political, linguistic, and legal — revolution has started

Before something great is born, the heavens usually show signs of things to come.

On 23 February 2020, the Jupiter conjunct Saturn and Pluto transit in Capricorn was already a reality. These planets would end up travelling through the sign of Capricorn at a maximum of 9 degrees or less apart, and they touched the cusp of the sign of Aquarius in December 2020. The Jupiter, Saturn, and Pluto conjunction in Capricorn would be maintained for the rest of the year 2020, which is a very long time in astrological terms.

So, what can a great astrologer expect from this "celestial gatecrasher"? Well, he or she can expect total upheaval of political structures, and massive transformation without precedent in human history.

It should be noted that the last time Jupiter, Saturn, and Pluto were in conjunction — very close to each other astrologically — in Capricorn was in 1894 BCE, or 3,914 years ago. At the time, the ancient city of Babylon was established by Sumu Abum, an Amorite king. The city was small and insignificant, but within a few generations it grew into one of the largest cities of the ancient world, especially under the rule of Hammurabi.

Virtually no theologian on earth is aware of this, but the Book of Daniel in the Bible actually describes "the Law of laws" which shall replace the Code of Hammurabi in importance, one of the earliest and most complete written legal codes, and something that was born only 140 years — in 1754 BCE — after the year of the rare astrological aspect mentioned above. "The Law of laws" was also mentioned in the pseudepigrapha of 2 Esdras 13, and it was also mentioned prophetically by the Buddha, in reference to the Maitreya§, and so it is even mentioned outside of Judaeo-Christian religious tradition.

All of a sudden, however, at least intellectually and spiritually, humanity is travelling at warp speed, and 140 years, 2 generations back then, is now 225 days, less than the length of a tropical year, thanks also to the extremely rare and productive Jupiter conjunct Saturn and Pluto transit in Capricorn.

What happened in the world that the fake media — it is the work of 'journalism' — didn't even cover, because it didn't have political significance, or significance for the powers that be, which is the only news they seem to care about?

Well, the Copernican revolution was the paradigm shift from the Ptolemaic model of the heavens, which described the cosmos as having Earth stationary at the centre of the universe, to the heliocentric model, with the Sun at the centre of the Solar System.

The Cesidian revolution is also a paradigm shift, but on multiple levels: political, linguistic, and legal at the very least.

From an Aristotelian societal-political model which assumes that men can only be stationed in Aristotelian zoos (cities, modern versions of the ancient Greek polis), to a model where men are happily stationed outside of Aristotelian zoos (an ectopolitan model), within their own self-sufficient and flexible, more natural societies, the kind of societies which probably ceased to exist sometime before the Bronze Age (circa 3300 BCE), when humans lived in relative harmony with nature, and in relative harmony with each other.

From a written language which only wishes to deceive (essentially the subject of linguistics today), a language only suitable for political and commercial propaganda, to a written language which only wishes to seek and find truth (this is what ectolinguistics is about).

Finally, from working within a legal environment where juridical, large, and fake human society (polity) is supposed to be central to our well being, to a society where natural, small, and true human society is the source of all independence, rather than an obstacle to all independence (a Cesidian law-based society).

According to the Cambridge Dictionary, a 'register' is the style of language, grammar, and words used for particular situations.

Also according to the Cambridge Dictionary, a 'language' is "the method of human communication that uses speaking and writing, or the system of communication in speaking and writing that is used by the people of a particular country".

Notice that like capitalists and socialists — politicos in general — in writing or in speech, the word "people" in the phrase above is also treated like a mere accessory. So most of the English used daily, especially in government- or corporation-financed writing, whether it is journalistic, or even if it is more academic in scope, is actually a 'register', which has been judged by Aristotelian extremophiles for at least 26 centuries now — at least since Josiah's religious reforms, which occurred in 621 BCE — like it were some natural written language of a real and fully represented and acknowledged people, not just the shorthand those in power use to get our votes, to get us to obey their often asinine rules, regulations, or laws, or to sell us something which is often even detrimental to ourselves, or to the people we love, and who we are responsible for, as is always the case in real or natural societies.

While it is true that you don't have include the often trivial and bad language of social media to be more socially inclusive and less linguistically paternalistic, it is a fact that a large part of the terms that are considered reasonable for inclusion in 'dictionaries' are in fact part of a government-corporate register, not part of any natural written language using the highest literary standards.

However, outside of the context of individual writers, some of which may be effectively ectojournalists, especially when they don't submit continuously and uncritically to the paramount Aristotelian bias of the civilisation paradigm or genus, most journalism is in fact yellow journalism (en-US) or tabloid journalism (en-GB), which cannot lead to accurate social or applied science in the long term, and even serious analytic journalism attempts from time to time cannot effectively change the dominant paradigm which is essentially hypocritical, fake, and actually pseudoscientific in its very nature.

A literary language should be the written vehicle a people use daily to communicate accurately and effectively, not an actual register used everyday in place of a real language only by those in power, and our so-called language 'dictionaries' — really completely arbitrary, mere language registers of the powers that be — also largely reflect that fictive language which is even less respectable than a register, because a register may be largely small talk, but it is usually not largely deceptive, monopolistic, or profit-seeking in nature, nor does it inherently treat most people as mere accessories.

A literary language should be used primarily for ectopolitical or multisocietal purposes, not for exclusively political or mass commercial or industrial purposes. It should not be treated like the oral dialect, or the mere literary variety of a language, if it is indeed used daily to communicate accurately and effectively, and especially with truth, not for the IOUs of central banks as the primary purpose for writing. That is the writing of slaves, not citizens. That is the writing of irresponsible infants, not responsible adults.

Linguistics is the study of language, how it works, how it is acquired, and how people use it to communicate. Although linguists are often interested in, and can speak a variety of languages, linguists know more about how language works, rather than having the ability to speak and understand multiple languages. It seems, however, that even linguistics is another Aristotelian pseudoscience, not just history, although it should be pointed out that this is certainly not always or universally the case.

Cognitive scientist, linguist, and sociopolitical critic Noam Chomsky, argues that while the US news media are adversarial towards the US government on foreign policy, institutional filters — actually the bias of Aristotelian extremophiles that I mention all the time — operate to ensure that the criticisms made generally stay within narrow bounds set by the US political elite — the oligarchs. Paradoxically, Chomsky's research in this area is largely ignored even by academics who agree with this conclusion. The institutional tendency to filter out anti-elite perspectives applies not only to the news media, but also to academia. Consequently, Chomsky's work is marginalised, due to its emphasis on government and corporate power, and the role even academia end up playing in actually buttressing elite power.

So even when an intellectual is well-known like Chomsky, even highly respected, this Aristotelian bias does not just affect the media and academia, but because of the Aristotelian filters these create, it also has a dominant effect on which new words, even concepts, enter the English 'dictionary'.

Since 29 December 2020, the words ectopolitical — which is synonymous with societal or multisocietal, or with Pythagorean — and ectopolitics — which means not affected or influenced at all by politics within, or between individual states or countries — have been coined by myself, and the ectojournalism, ectohistory, and now ectolinguistic revolution has started in the world's first ectolanguage, or Ectoenglish (ⓔ).

Because I'm quite fluent in Italian, I managed to begin communicating about the multifaceted Cesidian revolution also in «ectoitaliano», or Ectoitalian (ⓘ).

In previous emails which I started making on 17 January 2021, I sent an imperfect translation of the neologism (new word) of ectopolitan in Russian.

However, after a lot of research, I discovered that other words were either more appropriate as nouns, rather than as adjectives, or the word form was entirely incorrect in the target language.

Besides Russian, I have discovered issues also with other languages, and their version of the word ectopolitan, and tried my best to correct them.

I now have produced a good or decent original or translation of the word ectopolitan in 72 languages (or 49 distinct linguistic forms), and all these languages are spoken by approximately 7.17 billion of the world's 7.7 billion people (93% of the world's people). I have done this, because you are not likely to see this word, and despite its utility and current use, in even the most freedom-minded dictionary anytime soon, and in any of the world's major languages.

The languages on the list now are: Ectoenglishⓔ, Spanish, Catalan, Ectochineseⓩ (Mainland China, Malaysia, and Singapore; somewhat understandable also in Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Macau), Kazakh, Tajik, Mongolian, Tibetan, German, Dutch, Swedish, Danish, Finnish, Norwegian Bokmål, Icelandic, Malay-Indonesian, Ectofrenchⓕ, Corsican, Russian, Ukrainian, Serbian, Armenian, Japanese, Ectoitalianⓘ, Croatian, Slovene, Hungarian, Albanian, Amharic, Tigrinya, Czech, Slovak, Hausa, Swahili, Afrikaans, Venetian, Neapolitan, Sicilian, Sardinian, Maltese, Ectogreekⓖ, Portuguese, Interlingua, Esperanto, Polish, Estonian, Turkish, Bulgarian, Korean, Vietnamese, Filipino-Tagalog, Cebuano, Thai, Ectolatinⓛ, Hindi, Bengali, Telugu, Tamil, Marathi, Gujarati, Kannada, Malayalam, Punjabi (Gurmukhi script), Punjabi (Shahmukhi script), Persian, Ectohebrewⓗ, Ectooscanⓞ, Arabic, and Urdu.

This is what the word looks like in a nice blend of languages from around the world. The date in dd.mm.yyyy format of the most recent or correct version has been included in the list below for the ectohistorical record. Please feel free to make any suggestions for improvement if you can justify them, as this is probably a high quality work, but still a work in progress:

▪ Ectoenglishⓔ: Ectopolitan (31.12.2020)
▪ Español: Ectopolita (17.01.2021)
▪ Català: Ectopolita (17.01.2021)
▪ 外中文ⓩ:外都市 (17.01.2021)
▪ Қазақша: Эктополит (10.07.2021)
▪ Тоҷикӣ: Эктополит (10.07.2021)
▪ Монгол: Эктополит (21.01.2021)
བོད་ཡིག: ཕྱི་ལོགས་སྲིད་དོནའི (19.02.2021)
▪ Deutsch: Ektopolit (21.01.2021)
▪ Nederlands: Ectopolitische (25.01.2021)
▪ Svenska: Ektopolitiska (25.01.2021)
▪ Dansk: Ektopolitisk (27.06.2021)
▪ Suomi: Ektopoliittinen (27.06.2021)
▪ Norsk bokmål: Ektopolitiske (25.01.2021)
▪ Íslenska: Utanborgari (16.02.2021)
▪ Bahasa Indonesia: Ektopolitan (18.01.2021)
▪ Ectofrançaisⓕ: Ectopolite (17.01.2021)
▪ Corsu: Ectopolita (21.01.2021)
▪ Русский: Эктополит (18.01.2021)
▪ Українська: Ектополіт (18.01.2021)
▪ Српски: Ектополитска (30.06.2021)
▪ Հայերեն: Էկտոպոլիտան (27.06.2021)
▪ 日本語:エクトポリタン (17.01.2021)
▪ Ectoitalianoⓘ: Ectopolita (03.01.2021)
▪ Hrvatski: Ektopolit (27.06.2021)
▪ Slovenščina: Ectopolite (27.06.2021)
▪ Magyar: Ektopolita (08.02.2021)
▪ Shqip: Ektopolit (18.01.2021)
▪ አማርኛ፦ ኤክቶፖሊቶች (11.07.2021)
▪ ትርጕም፦ ደጋዊፖሊተኛ (11.07.2021)
▪ Čeština: Ektopolitní (30.06.2021)
▪ Slovenčina: Ektopolitný (30.06.2021)
▪ Hausa: Kaisiris Tallini (02.07.2021)
▪ Kiswahili: Ectopolitan (30.06.2021)
▪ Afrikaans: Ektopolitiese (25.01.2021)
▪ Vèneto: Ectopolita (18.01.2021)
▪ Napulitano: Ectopolita (18.01.2021)
▪ Sicilianu: Ectopolita (21.01.2021)
▪ Sardu: Ectopolita (21.01.2021)
▪ Malti: Ektopolitan (21.01.2021)
▪ Εκτοελληνικάⓖ: Εκτοπολίτικος (17.01.2021)
▪ Português: Ectopolita (17.01.2021)
▪ Interlingua: Ectopolita (18.01.2021)
▪ Esperanto: Ektopolito (21.01.2021)
▪ Polski: Ektopolityczny (18.01.2021)
▪ Eesti: Ektopoliit (25.01.2021)
▪ Türkçe: Ektopolit (30.06.2021)
▪ Български: Ектополит (25.01.2021)
▪ 한국어: 세계친구인 (17.01.2021)
▪ Tiếng Việt: Ngoài chính trị (15.03.2021)
▪ Tagalog: Ectopolitan (25.01.2021)
▪ Cebuano: Ectopolitan (25.01.2021)
▪ ไทย: ความเป็นข้างนอก (18.01.2021)
▪ Ectolatinaⓛ: Ectopolites (21.01.2021)
▪ हिन्दी: एक्टोपॉलिटन (18.01.2021)
▪ বাংলা: বাহিরেবিশ্বজনীন (25.01.2021)
▪ తెలుగు: ఎక్టోపాలిటన్ (26.02.2021)
▪ தமிழ்: எக்டோபாலிட்டன் (25.06.2021)
▪ मराठी: बाहेरकुटुंबी (02.07.2021)
▪ ગુજરાતી: બહારગરિક (02.07.2021)
▪ ಕನ್ನಡ: ಎಕ್ಟೋಪಾಲಿಟನ್ (02.07.2021)
▪ മലയാളം: എക്ടോപൊളിറ്റൻ (30.06.2021)
▪ ਪੰਜਾਬੀ: ਐਕਟੋਪੋਲੀਟਨ (26.02.2021)
(26.02.2021) پنجابی: اکتوپولیتن
(30.06.2021) فارسی: خارج وطنی
(21.01.2021) אַקְטוֹפּוֹלִיטִי :ⓗאַקְטוֹעִבְרִית▪
(14.04.2021) ɒɈiloqoɈɔɘ :ⓞoɔƨooɈɔɘ ▪
(18.01.2021) عربى: خارجبوليتان
(18.01.2021) اردو: ایکٹوپولیٹن

Readers should also note that words related to ectopolitan, ectojournalist, ectohistorian, and ectolinguistics do exist, have been used at least in English, if not also in Italian, French, and even in Chinese in an instance, and have distinctive meanings:

exopolitics (circa 2000, and not my coinage), which deals with the art of government as concerned with creating or influencing policy toward extraterrestrial phenomena and extraterrestrial beings (so the exopolitics term has a quite separate meaning from ectopolitics, because the latter is still involved with terrestrials, just more advanced terrestrials, even a new race of terrestrials).
delineate (01.04.2018): a "delineate of the world" today is also known as an ectopolitan, which is not a "citizen of the world" or cosmopolitan, and is someone outside of any civis or city, outside of any Aristotelian genus or civilisation, and thus he or she is part of an entirely new genus. A new race, if you will. Call him or her Homo sapiens ethicus, or even Homo noeticus. In fact, since citizens are no longer necessarily of just one of two genders, and may be commingled without any rational or legal reason, with the annulment of the rights of at least one or both genders, it is probably best to call them neither "men", nor "women", as citizens are often called, but gods and goddesses, for deities shall not have their gender rights, or any other rights arbitrarily abridged by the latest Aristotelian zookeeper, since they are not political animals at all. There are several genera — the plural of the Latin term genus — here on Earth, and these genera collectively comprise a single species, which cannot be an exclusively political species. This truth is self-evident, especially if you visit some remote islands under India's informal jurisdiction, or the Amazon rain forest of Brazil. Some of these are even formally called stateless people, and how can such people really be defined citizens, even if they don't have an odd stick coming out of their nostrils?
ectopolitical (29.12.2020), which is synonymous with societal or multisocietal, or with Pythagorean (this is actually a mathematics and physics discovery, part of a new calculus called Cesidian analytic theology, but it is also more accurate sociology, and probably more accurate psychology, even though the latter assertion I still have to prove experimentally, so it only seems like a more reasonable theory at this stage).
ectopolitics (29.12.2020), which means not affected or influenced at all by politics within, or between individual states or countries.
ectopolitician (30.12.2020), someone employed in Pythagorean politics; a societalist, and by that word I do not mean global socialist or globalist, as French speakers usually intend, or cosmopolitan, as libertarians may intend, because the latter — socialists, globalists, cosmopolitans, and libertarians — are still involved in Aristotelian politics, and anarchists are just hostile to politics, but haven't successfully adapted intellectually, emotionally, socially, and/or economically to life outside of the Aristotelian, or civilised world.
ectojournalist (13.01.2021), which is a "lab technician" for special scientists called ectohistorians (see below).
ectojournalism (15.01.2021), which means journalism which is not fake, because ectojournalism has societal/multisocietal, and not materialistic, pseudo-economic [in reality politics deals with politonomy (19.07.2020) or politonomic (19.07.2020) concerns, not genuine economic ones], political, or propagandistic concerns; ectojournalism is journalism which could never be described yellow journalism (en-US), or tabloid journalism (en-GB); ectojournalism refuses to serve politicians and corporations altogether, Aristotelian politics, or the paradigm or genus (Cesidian societal-political term) of civilisation, yet it is actually post-historical or futuristic, not prehistorical.
ectohistorian (15.01.2021), someone employed in Pythagorean history, who specialises in the post-civilisation age.
ectohistory (15.01.2021), which is supported daily by ectojournalists, and in general, more analytically-minded theologians and philosophers, as well as social, applied, and spiritual scientists.

ectolanguage (30.01.2021): a natural, usually broader and more vibrant written language, easily used by parallel language speakers, which coins new words based on actual and continued use for ectopolitan (multisocietal or Pythagorean) purposes; the symbol for ectolanguages in general, even for Ectoenglish specifically, is the ⓔ or Unicode character "ⓔ"; the symbol for Ectoitalian specifically, is the ⓘ or Unicode character "ⓘ". Other active ectolanguages, other real natural or multisocietal languages, not mere government-corporate registers of a single country, follow below:

 

Language Language endonym Symbol Code
Ectoenglish Ectoenglish een
Ectoitalian ectoitaliano eit
Ectofrench ectofrançais efr
Ectochinese 外中文 ezh
Ectohebrew אַקְטוֹעִבְרִית ehe
Ectolatin ectolatina ela
Ectogreek εκτοελληνικά egre
Ectooscan oɔƨooɈɔɘ eosc

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ectolinguistics (30.01.2021): means outside of (primarily) Aristotelian linguistics, a more scientific, societal, inclusive, and social justice-seeking form of linguistics.

MT Kaisiris Tallini

Notes

 

§ Paul Carus, The Gospel of Buddha:

 

"And the Blessed One said to Ananda, 'I am not the first Buddha who has come upon Earth, nor shall I be the last. In due time another Buddha will arise in the world, a Holy One, a supremely enlightened One, endowed with wisdom in conduct, embracing the Universe, an incomparable leader of men, a ruler of devas and mortals. He will reveal to you the same eternal truths, that I have taught you. He will establish his Law, glorious in its origin, glorious at the climax, and glorious at the goal, in the spirit and in the letter. He will proclaim a righteous life, wholly perfect and pure, such as I now proclaim. His disciples will number many thousands while mine number many hundreds.'

 

"Ananda said, 'How shall we know him?'

 

"The Blessed One said, 'He will be known as Maitreya!' "

 

Aristotelian extremophiles (‎‎08.02.2020) are people who sincerely believe there is:

 

1. no family or clan outside of the archaic, primarily sex-based and -driven marriage, "holy matrimony" which often produces separation, divorce, and estrangement;
2. no family or clan which includes many more types of kinship (philicities) than just sexual- and child-based ones;
3. no true religion outside of monotheism without any real or substantial Messiah (or Messiah equivalent);
4. no Christianity outside of some specific Bible version, specific biblical canon, specific rule by Pope or Patriarch, or highly questionable, even disingenuous, fake, and/or contradictory biblical narrative or interpretation (this is known today as Bible-based, "deepfake Judaeo-Christianity");
5. no politics outside of civilisation or city-based paradigms (that is, there is no such thing as metapolitics, or better, ectopolitics);
6. no economics outside of central bank- or government-issued money, which is convenient only to the hyper-interest charging banks, and/or hyper-taxing and exploitative governments (more accurately these are politonomies, rather than "economies", if proper and accurate Greek roots were used);
7. no natural or de facto society outside of legal or juridical entities only, even though they are all slave-holding and -making entities, all fake societies or pseudo-koinonia;
8. no religious values outside of organised, tribal, or Babylonian religion [only Babylonian Judaism and Aristotelian Christianity exist in western countries, so people already have the "mark of the beast", simply because they worship the beast (Aristotle), and can't even tell they are beast worshippers, Aristotelian "political animals" even before Charles Darwin's pseudoscience: a rather cartoonish eschatological situation, which however perfectly explains why Jesus, or the Son of Man, will not find any faith (Luke 18:8) in a world of 7.7 billion people, with 2.4 billion Christians, since they are all perfectly adapted to live with Satan (Aristotle), they are all perfect satanic minions or bootlickers];
9. no other kinds of values besides excessively materialistic, entropic, anti-societal, and/or sexist, ageist, and singleton-discriminating ones;
10. no legitimate employer outside of governmental or company slave holders — states or countries are never free societies, as they are all controlled/owned by oligarchs, oligarchic parties, financial monopolies, professional groups, and very wealthy people; and companies can be purchased or sold, can be owned, while free (ie, not enslaved) people, but also free (natural, de facto, or non juridical) societies can only supported or managed, not owned by anyone.

 

We have gone from an economy derived from the Greek words for household, or oikos (οἶκος), and rules, or nomos (νόμος), to an economy dominated by corporate entities which many times can be the size of a national company, a kind of phyle (φυλή) sociologically, so we now actually have a "phylonomy". However, the world is effectively dominated by complex and gigantic corporate entities the size of a multinational, like multiple phyle (φυλή) or a single polis (πόλις) sociologically, so lately we have gone from a "phylonomy" to a "politonomy", which is definitely not a true economy anymore. A true economy should feed and educate the natural children of families, clans, and congregations, not just the juridical children of governments (aka corporations).

 

NB: To contact author, Kaisiris Tallini: click on "Email Me" link on this webpage: https://cal.berkeley.edu/hmct.

 

 

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.