• If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!


My race

Page history last edited by Kaisiris Tallini 2 years, 4 months ago

My real race or genus


What is my real race, or in Latin, my genus?


To summarise, it is Homo sapiens ethicus.


Forget the biological classification now in use. Not only it doesn't make any sense, but it is really crappy Latin too!


The Latin word Homo describes my nation, tribe, or in Latin, my tribus. Other words for that are institution (as a practical matter, you need at least two organisations, or two curiae in Latin working in sync, in order to form an institution), village, or state. This is the Tallini Fourth World. The Tallini Fourth World describes any myths I may still follow or adhere to, things that are like theories, which are either pure opinion at worst, or educated guesses at best. All my myths today are entirely Cesidian or Holocartesian.


The Latin word sapiens describes my ethnicity, confederation, or in Latin, my civis. Other words for that are agency (as a practical matter, you need at least two institutions working in sync, to form an agency, or four organisations), town, or country. This is the Tallini Third World. The Tallini Third World describes any methods I may still use to ascertain truth, things that are like axioms, postulates, or laws, which result in better than educated guesses, since this is established knowledge. All my methods today are entirely Neocartesian.


The Latin word ethicus describes my race, commonwealth, or in Latin, my genus. Other words for that are IGO (as a practical matter, you need at least two agencies working in sync, to form an IGO, or four institutions, or eight organisations), city, continent or region. This is the Tallini Second World. The Tallini Second World, which is either entirely missing in most men today, or still developing (these men think they are "sapient", but can't really prove it, because you see, they aren't always ethical), describes any paradigms† which I may still use to organise truth in a multidisciplinary, or more comprehensive or holistic way, things like Cesidian analytic theology (Cat) for me, which is basically a real Theory of Everything (ToE); or Cesidian law (Claw), which doesn't come from some fake god (a country in disguise), or from some Deep Fake Bible, but from that which I was able to both discover, and verify independently, as my own real god (actually a continent or region in disguise), or ectopolitan. All my paradigms today are entirely Pythagorean.


MT Kaisiris Tallini




Since the Copernican or scientific revolution (circa March 1543 – 29.12.2020), in science and philosophy a paradigm is a distinct set of concepts or thought patterns, including theories, research methods, postulates, and standards for what constitutes legitimate contributions to a field. The Cesidian or ethical revolution (29.12.2020 – Ω) has discovered and verified many flaws with this paradigm, since it is primarily Aristotelian (satanic) in nature, or everything is subject to some fake god (Aristotle, or someone who basically worships him every day as a politician or billionaire). Pythagoras was a real god in his time, and is still followed to this day, but only in a few sciences. All other sciences are basically counterfeit Pythagorai.


The name Pythagoras in Ancient Greek form is Πυθαγόρας. Pythagoras (Πυθαγόρας) in Ancient Greek would have followed the first declension by conjugation as a noun, which in the plural form actually had two forms for the nominative case: the dual Πυθαγόρα (or Pythagora), and the plural Πυθαγόραι (or Pythagorai). Since there are many sciences, not just two, the appropriate form for more than two Pythagoras-like people is thus Pythagorai. It should also be noted, however, that from a Judaeo-Christian perspective, not just a Cesidian perspective, since only two Gods are mentioned in the Bible in both Isaiah 44:6 and John 1:1, two Lords or Jehovahs, two "Alpha and Omega", two "Aleph and Tav" are mentioned, or the Messiah, the king of Yisrael [יִשְׂרָאֵל], and his Redeemer, or Yehovah [יְהֹוָה] of hosts, you can state, with some evidence at hand, that there can never be more than two Pythagorai or real Gods, but two Pythagora are predicted in the Bible, or two real Gods. Yes, Ancient Greek is very good for distinguishing between real and fake gods.


Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.