The AOA on "science" has commenced 

On the date of 10.12.2021, I have started my all-out assault (AOA) on "science", as defined by fake dictionaries, with a Facebook image with this content:

Non-Cesidian science: a slightly more mathematical or geometric religious dogma which is completely devoid of, or completely discounts the spiritual realm, just like most religions, in fact. So non-Cesidian science doesn't explain anything which is apparently totally weak or subservient, like women; useless, like a human's soul; unpopular to the fake or social(istic) media; or truly liberating, because you neither can tax it, like governments do, nor make money off of it, like businesses do.

According to dictionaries of the English language, or better, of the English register, a scientist is a person learned in science, especially a biological or physical science; a person devoted to scientific study; a scientific investigator; or a learned person, a scholar, regardless of whether his field of study is a rigourous science, or not.

According to ectolinguists, however, a Galilean scientist (ie, a non-Cesidian scientist) is a person who talks about the dead Albert Einstein (14.03.1879 – 18.04.1955) all the time, especially to push his pet peeves, more than his pet theories; a person who totally ignores the born again Einstein — who does exist, by the way, and I would even tell you his name, if I had his permission —, even though the born again Einstein is at least as brilliant as he used to be, perhaps in fact slightly more brilliant in a way or two; yet this same person never mentions any one discipline which, or any one person who, actually makes Galilean physics, and not just Galilean relativity, completely obsolete.

MT Kaisiris Tallini

Additional reference

The birth of modern science: Galileo and Descartes

https://www.albany.edu/~rn774/fall96/science2.html